Central African Republic vs Congo: Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound

Central African Republic
259 per 1000,000 population, WHO
in 2011
Congo
235 per 1000,000 population, WHO
in 2011
Central African Republic rank
9th
Congo rank
12th

Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Congo
0200400600199020002011

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 259 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 235 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Congo, a difference of 24 per 1000,000 population, WHO.

That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.

Across all 22 years both countries report, Central African Republic has been ahead every year.

Central African Republic ranks 9th and Congo ranks 12th of 53 countries.

Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 570.4 per 1000,000 population, WHO 142 per 1000,000 population, WHO 428.4 per 1000,000 population, WHO Central African Republic
2000s 426.3 per 1000,000 population, WHO 239.7 per 1000,000 population, WHO 186.6 per 1000,000 population, WHO Central African Republic
2010s 268 per 1000,000 population, WHO 236.5 per 1000,000 population, WHO 31.5 per 1000,000 population, WHO Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound, Central African Republic or Congo?
Central African Republic, at 259 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 235 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Congo as of 2011.
What is the difference in tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound between Central African Republic and Congo?
24 per 1000,000 population, WHO, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Congo?
22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
How do Central African Republic and Congo rank globally for tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound?
Central African Republic ranks 9th and Congo ranks 12th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report, published as Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound (per 1000,000 population, WHO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Congo: Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tuberculosis-prevalence-rate-low-uncertainty-bound-per-1000-000-population-who/central-african-republic/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tuberculosis-prevalence-rate-low-uncertainty-bound-per-1000-000-population-who/central-african-republic/congo-rep/">Central African Republic vs Congo: Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tuberculosis prevalence rate, low uncertainty bound (per 1000,000 population, WHO)
Unit
per 1000,000 population, WHO
Source
World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 1,166 data points, 1990–2011
Last refreshed

The number of cases of tuberculosis (all forms) in a population at a given point in time (the middle of the calendar year), expressed as the rate per 100 000 population. It is sometimes referred to as "point prevalence" low uncertainty bound. Estimates include cases of TB in people with HIV. Published values are rounded to three significant figures. Uncertainty bounds are provided in addition to best estimates.