Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Tuberculosis prevalence rate, high uncertainty bound

Cape Verde
387 per 1000,000 population, WHO
in 2011
Equatorial Guinea
435 per 1000,000 population, WHO
in 2011
Cape Verde rank
27th
Equatorial Guinea rank
24th

Tuberculosis prevalence rate, high uncertainty bound over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Equatorial Guinea
0200400600800199020002011

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 435 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 387 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Cape Verde, a difference of 48 per 1000,000 population, WHO.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 27th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th of 53 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 538.7 per 1000,000 population, WHO 834.1 per 1000,000 population, WHO 295.4 per 1000,000 population, WHO Equatorial Guinea
2000s 460.6 per 1000,000 population, WHO 557.1 per 1000,000 population, WHO 96.5 per 1000,000 population, WHO Equatorial Guinea
2010s 396 per 1000,000 population, WHO 450.5 per 1000,000 population, WHO 54.5 per 1000,000 population, WHO Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tuberculosis prevalence rate, high uncertainty bound, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 435 per 1000,000 population, WHO against 387 per 1000,000 population, WHO in Cape Verde as of 2011.
What is the difference in tuberculosis prevalence rate, high uncertainty bound between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
48 per 1000,000 population, WHO, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
22 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for tuberculosis prevalence rate, high uncertainty bound?
Cape Verde ranks 27th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report, published as Tuberculosis prevalence rate, high uncertainty bound (per 1000,000 population, WHO). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Tuberculosis prevalence rate, high uncertainty bound. Statizoid, drawing on World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tuberculosis-prevalence-rate-high-uncertainty-bound-per-1000-000-population-who/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tuberculosis-prevalence-rate-high-uncertainty-bound-per-1000-000-population-who/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/">Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Tuberculosis prevalence rate, high uncertainty bound</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tuberculosis prevalence rate, high uncertainty bound (per 1000,000 population, WHO)
Unit
per 1000,000 population, WHO
Source
World Health Organization, Global Tuberculosis Control Report
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 1,166 data points, 1990–2011
Last refreshed

The number of cases of tuberculosis (all forms) in a population at a given point in time (the middle of the calendar year), expressed as the rate per 100 000 population. It is sometimes referred to as "point prevalence" high uncertainty bound. Estimates include cases of TB in people with HIV. Published values are rounded to three significant figures. Uncertainty bounds are provided in addition to best estimates.