Jamaica vs Malta: Tuberculosis cases, per unit of GDP
Jamaica
0 cases per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malta
0 cases per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Jamaica rank
158th
Malta rank
155th
Tuberculosis cases, per unit of GDP over time
- Jamaica
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 0 cases per US$ of GDP against 0 cases per US$ of GDP in Jamaica, a difference of 0 cases per US$ of GDP.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 158th and Malta ranks 155th of 207 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 cases per US$ of GDP | 0 cases per US$ of GDP | 0 cases per US$ of GDP | Jamaica |
| 2010s | 0 cases per US$ of GDP | 0 cases per US$ of GDP | 0 cases per US$ of GDP | Jamaica |
| 2020s | 0 cases per US$ of GDP | 0 cases per US$ of GDP | 0 cases per US$ of GDP | Jamaica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis cases, per unit of gdp, Jamaica or Malta?
- Malta, at 0 cases per US$ of GDP against 0 cases per US$ of GDP in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis cases, per unit of gdp between Jamaica and Malta?
- 0 cases per US$ of GDP, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Malta?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Malta rank globally for tuberculosis cases, per unit of gdp?
- Jamaica ranks 158th and Malta ranks 155th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tuberculosis cases, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tuberculosis cases divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.