What is the difference in tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre between Chile and Samoa?

0.0004 cases per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Samoa?

24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Samoa: Tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre

Chile

0.0051 cases per square kilometre

in 2023

Samoa

0.0047 cases per square kilometre

in 2023

Chile rank

173rd

Samoa rank

175th

Tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre over time

Chile
Samoa

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0051 cases per square kilometre against 0.0047 cases per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0.0004 cases per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Samoa ahead.

Chile ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 175th of 208 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Samoa	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.0051 cases per square kilometre	0.009 cases per square kilometre	0.0039 cases per square kilometre	Samoa
2010s	0.0044 cases per square kilometre	0.0068 cases per square kilometre	0.0024 cases per square kilometre	Samoa
2020s	0.0045 cases per square kilometre	0.0043 cases per square kilometre	0.0002 cases per square kilometre	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre, Chile or Samoa?: Chile, at 0.0051 cases per square kilometre against 0.0047 cases per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
What is the difference in tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre between Chile and Samoa?: 0.0004 cases per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Samoa?: 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Chile and Samoa rank globally for tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre?: Chile ranks 173rd and Samoa ranks 175th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Samoa: Tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tuberculosis-cases-per-square-kilometre/chile/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tuberculosis-cases-per-square-kilometre/chile/samoa/">Chile vs Samoa: Tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Tuberculosis cases, per square kilometre
Unit: cases per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 208 places, 4,932 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed: 10 September 2026

Tuberculosis cases divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.