Belarus vs Macao: Tuberculosis cases, annual growth rate
Belarus
-11.76 % change on previous year
in 2024
Macao
-12.5 % change on previous year
in 2024
Belarus rank
174th
Macao rank
176th
Tuberculosis cases, annual growth rate over time
- Belarus
- Macao
How they compare
Belarus currently reports -11.76 % change on previous year against -12.5 % change on previous year in Macao, a difference of 0.74 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Macao ahead.
Belarus ranks 174th and Macao ranks 176th of 210 countries.
Macao has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Macao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -6.2 % change on previous year | -5.5 % change on previous year | 0.7006 % change on previous year | Macao |
| 2010s | -10.35 % change on previous year | -0.8371 % change on previous year | 9.51 % change on previous year | Macao |
| 2020s | -11.05 % change on previous year | -5.29 % change on previous year | 5.77 % change on previous year | Macao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis cases, annual growth rate, Belarus or Macao?
- Belarus, at -11.76 % change on previous year against -12.5 % change on previous year in Macao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis cases, annual growth rate between Belarus and Macao?
- 0.74 % change on previous year, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Macao?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Macao rank globally for tuberculosis cases, annual growth rate?
- Belarus ranks 174th and Macao ranks 176th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tuberculosis cases, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Tuberculosis cases. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.