Sao Tome and Principe vs Sudan: Tuberculosis case detection rate
Tuberculosis case detection rate over time
- Sao Tome and Principe
- Sudan
How they compare
Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 63.0% against 61.0% in Sudan, a difference of 2.0%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sudan ahead.
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th and Sudan ranks 177th of 206 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sao Tome and Principe | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.2% | 49.2% | 7.0% | Sudan |
| 2010s | 50.9% | 55.9% | 5.0% | Sudan |
| 2020s | 62.8% | 62.4% | 0.4% | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis case detection rate, Sao Tome and Principe or Sudan?
- Sao Tome and Principe, at 63.0% against 61.0% in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis case detection rate between Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan?
- 2.0%, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Sao Tome and Principe and Sudan rank globally for tuberculosis case detection rate?
- Sao Tome and Principe ranks 174th and Sudan ranks 177th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Tuberculosis Report, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Tuberculosis case detection rate (%, all forms). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tuberculosis case detection rate (all forms) is the number of new and relapse tuberculosis cases notified to WHO in a given year, divided by WHO's estimate of the number of incident tuberculosis cases for the same year, expressed as a percentage. Estimates for all years are recalculated as new information becomes available and techniques are refined, so they may differ from those published previously.