Cabo Verde vs Central African Republic: Tuberculosis case detection rate
Tuberculosis case detection rate over time
- Cabo Verde
- Central African Republic
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 71.0% against 71.0% in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 121st and Central African Republic ranks 121st of 206 countries.
Cabo Verde has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Central African Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 47.0% | 19.1% | 27.9% | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 65.9% | 39.3% | 26.6% | Cabo Verde |
| 2020s | 70.8% | 63.2% | 7.6% | Cabo Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis case detection rate, Cabo Verde or Central African Republic?
- Cabo Verde, at 71.0% against 71.0% in Central African Republic as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis case detection rate between Cabo Verde and Central African Republic?
- 0.0%, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Central African Republic?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Cabo Verde and Central African Republic rank globally for tuberculosis case detection rate?
- Cabo Verde ranks 121st and Central African Republic ranks 121st of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Global Tuberculosis Report, World Health Organization (WHO), published as Tuberculosis case detection rate (%, all forms). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tuberculosis case detection rate (all forms) is the number of new and relapse tuberculosis cases notified to WHO in a given year, divided by WHO's estimate of the number of incident tuberculosis cases for the same year, expressed as a percentage. Estimates for all years are recalculated as new information becomes available and techniques are refined, so they may differ from those published previously.