Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) vs Papua New Guinea: Treatment success rate: XDR-TB cases
Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region)
74
in 2022
Papua New Guinea
100
in 2019
Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) rank
1st
Papua New Guinea rank
1st
Treatment success rate: XDR-TB cases over time
- Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region)
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 100 against 74 in Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region), a difference of 26.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.4 times Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) ahead.
Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 11 groups.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment success rate: xdr-tb cases, Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 100 against 74 in Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in treatment success rate: xdr-tb cases between Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) and Papua New Guinea?
- 26, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) and Papua New Guinea?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) and Papua New Guinea rank globally for treatment success rate: xdr-tb cases?
- Eastern Mediterranean (WHO region) ranks 1st and Papua New Guinea ranks 1st of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Treatment success rate: XDR-TB cases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.