New Zealand vs Suriname: Treatment for hypertension
New Zealand
49.5%
in 2019
Suriname
49.5%
in 2019
New Zealand rank
61st
Suriname rank
61st
Treatment for hypertension over time
- New Zealand
- Suriname
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 49.5% against 49.5% in Suriname, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1990 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 61st of 192 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.8% | 29.4% | 2.4% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 44.5% | 40.7% | 3.8% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 50.2% | 48.5% | 1.6% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment for hypertension, New Zealand or Suriname?
- New Zealand, at 49.5% against 49.5% in Suriname as of 2019.
- What is the difference in treatment for hypertension between New Zealand and Suriname?
- 0.0%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Suriname?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do New Zealand and Suriname rank globally for treatment for hypertension?
- New Zealand ranks 61st and Suriname ranks 61st of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization's Global Health Observatory Data Repository, published as Treatment for hypertension (% of adults ages 30-79 with hypertension). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Treatment for hypertension is the percentage of adults ages 30-79 with hypertension who were taking medicine for hypertension. Hypertension is defined as having systolic blood pressure =140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure =90 mmHg, or taking medication for hypertension.