Nauru vs Zimbabwe: Treatment for hypertension, male
Nauru
27.6%
in 2019
Zimbabwe
27.5%
in 2019
Nauru rank
125th
Zimbabwe rank
127th
Treatment for hypertension, male over time
- Nauru
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 27.6% against 27.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1%.
Across all 30 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 192 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 23.9% | 9.5% | 14.5% | Nauru |
| 2000s | 24.3% | 15.6% | 8.7% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 26.5% | 23.7% | 2.9% | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher treatment for hypertension, male, Nauru or Zimbabwe?
- Nauru, at 27.6% against 27.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2019.
- What is the difference in treatment for hypertension, male between Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 0.1%, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2019.
- How do Nauru and Zimbabwe rank globally for treatment for hypertension, male?
- Nauru ranks 125th and Zimbabwe ranks 127th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization's Global Health Observatory Data Repository, published as Treatment for hypertension, male (% of male adults ages 30-79 with hypertension). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Treatment for hypertension, male, is the percentage of adults ages 30-79 with hypertension who were taking medicine for hypertension. Hypertension is defined as having systolic blood pressure =140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure =90 mmHg, or taking medication for hypertension.