Latvia vs Monaco: Total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita
Latvia
0 units per person
in 2025
Monaco
0 units per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
106th
Monaco rank
106th
Total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Monaco
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Monaco, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 106th and Monaco ranks 106th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Monaco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Monaco |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita, Latvia or Monaco?
- Latvia, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita between Latvia and Monaco?
- 0 units per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Monaco?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Monaco rank globally for total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 106th and Monaco ranks 106th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total tetanus - number of reported cases divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.