China vs Tonga: Total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita
China
0 units per person
in 2025
Tonga
0 units per person
in 2025
China rank
105th
Tonga rank
106th
Total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita over time
- China
- Tonga
How they compare
China currently reports 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Tonga, a difference of 0 units per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2005 it was China ahead.
China ranks 105th and Tonga ranks 106th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | Tonga |
| 2010s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | China |
| 2020s | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | 0 units per person | China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita, China or Tonga?
- China, at 0 units per person against 0 units per person in Tonga as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita between China and Tonga?
- 0 units per person, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Tonga?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do China and Tonga rank globally for total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita?
- China ranks 105th and Tonga ranks 106th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total tetanus - number of reported cases, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total tetanus - number of reported cases divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.