El Salvador vs Sri Lanka: Total tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled
El Salvador
5
in 2025
Sri Lanka
6
in 2025
El Salvador rank
70th
Sri Lanka rank
68th
Total tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled over time
- El Salvador
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 6 against 5 in El Salvador, a difference of 1.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.2 times El Salvador's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 52 shared years of data; in 1974 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
El Salvador ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 68th of 210 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 135.67 | 1,909 | 1,773 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 61.4 | 604.8 | 543.4 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 17.9 | 116.95 | 99.05 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 6.9 | 41.6 | 34.7 | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 4.4 | 11.4 | 7 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 3.67 | 5 | 1.33 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled, El Salvador or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 6 against 5 in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in total tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled between El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
- 1, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Sri Lanka?
- 52 years are reported by both, from 1974 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Sri Lanka rank globally for total tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled?
- El Salvador ranks 70th and Sri Lanka ranks 68th of 210 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total tetanus - number of reported cases, gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total tetanus - number of reported cases with 793 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.