Cuba vs Latvia: Total tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate
Cuba
-100 % change on previous year
in 2018
Latvia
-100 % change on previous year
in 2008
Cuba rank
95th
Latvia rank
95th
Total tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate over time
- Cuba
- Latvia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 95th and Latvia ranks 95th of 184 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 46.19 % change on previous year | -1.19 % change on previous year | 47.38 % change on previous year | Cuba |
| 2000s | 25 % change on previous year | -41.67 % change on previous year | 66.67 % change on previous year | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher total tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate, Cuba or Latvia?
- Cuba, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in total tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate between Cuba and Latvia?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2001.
- How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for total tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate?
- Cuba ranks 95th and Latvia ranks 95th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Total tetanus - number of reported cases, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Total tetanus - number of reported cases. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.