Africa (WHO region) vs Latvia: TB patients with known HIV status
Africa (WHO region)
89.0%
in 2024
Latvia
100.0%
in 2024
Africa (WHO region) rank
2nd
Latvia rank
1st
TB patients with known HIV status over time
- Africa (WHO region)
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 100.0% against 89.0% in Africa (WHO region), a difference of 11.0%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Africa (WHO region)'s.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Latvia ahead.
Africa (WHO region) ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 11 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, Africa (WHO region) averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Africa (WHO region) | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.8% | 87.4% | 58.7% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 77.4% | 74.8% | 2.6% | Africa (WHO region) |
| 2020s | 89.0% | 100.0% | 11.0% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tb patients with known hiv status, Africa (WHO region) or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 100.0% against 89.0% in Africa (WHO region) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in tb patients with known hiv status between Africa (WHO region) and Latvia?
- 11.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Africa (WHO region) and Latvia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2024.
- How do Africa (WHO region) and Latvia rank globally for tb patients with known hiv status?
- Africa (WHO region) ranks 2nd and Latvia ranks 1st of 11 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as TB patients with known HIV status (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.