Iceland vs New Caledonia: Tuberculosis patients who tested positive for HIV
Iceland
0 patients
in 2014
New Caledonia
0 patients
in 2021
Iceland rank
160th
New Caledonia rank
160th
Tuberculosis patients who tested positive for HIV over time
- Iceland
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 0 patients against 0 patients in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 patients.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2004 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Iceland ranks 160th and New Caledonia ranks 160th of 201 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 patients | 0.25 patients | 0.75 patients | Iceland |
| 2010s | 1 patients | 0 patients | 1 patients | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tuberculosis patients who tested positive for hiv, Iceland or New Caledonia?
- Iceland, at 0 patients against 0 patients in New Caledonia as of 2014.
- What is the difference in tuberculosis patients who tested positive for hiv between Iceland and New Caledonia?
- 0 patients, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and New Caledonia?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2010.
- How do Iceland and New Caledonia rank globally for tuberculosis patients who tested positive for hiv?
- Iceland ranks 160th and New Caledonia ranks 160th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (2026); Population based on various sources (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Tuberculosis patients who tested positive for HIV. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Estimated number of tuberculosis (new and relapsed) patients that tested positive for HIV.