Mus vs New Zealand: Taxes as a % of price: specific excise
Mus
65.1%
in 2022
New Zealand
69.7%
in 2022
Mus rank
1st
New Zealand rank
3rd
Taxes as a % of price: specific excise over time
- Mus
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 69.7% against 65.1% in Mus, a difference of 4.6%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Mus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Mus ahead.
Mus ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 2 regions.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mus averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 67.7% | 58.9% | 8.8% | Mus |
| 2010s | 61.2% | 65.1% | 3.9% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 66.6% | 69.3% | 2.7% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher taxes as a % of price: specific excise, Mus or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 69.7% against 65.1% in Mus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in taxes as a % of price: specific excise between Mus and New Zealand?
- 4.6%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and New Zealand?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Mus and New Zealand rank globally for taxes as a % of price: specific excise?
- Mus ranks 1st and New Zealand ranks 3rd of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Taxes as a % of price: specific excise. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.