Kiribati vs Samoa: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita

Kiribati
314.56 current international $
in 2023
Samoa
328.53 current international $
in 2023
Kiribati rank
123rd
Samoa rank
120th

Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita over time

  • Kiribati
  • Samoa
100150200250300350200020112023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 328.53 current international $ against 314.56 current international $ in Kiribati, a difference of 13.97 current international $.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kiribati ahead.

Kiribati ranks 123rd and Samoa ranks 120th of 193 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 163.42 current international $ 141.67 current international $ 21.75 current international $ Kiribati
2010s 173.83 current international $ 233.72 current international $ 59.9 current international $ Samoa
2020s 280.48 current international $ 308.57 current international $ 28.08 current international $ Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita, Kiribati or Samoa?
Samoa, at 328.53 current international $ against 314.56 current international $ in Kiribati as of 2023.
What is the difference in tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita between Kiribati and Samoa?
13.97 current international $, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Samoa?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Kiribati and Samoa rank globally for tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita?
Kiribati ranks 123rd and Samoa ranks 120th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Samoa: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/kiribati/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/kiribati/samoa/">Kiribati vs Samoa: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita
Unit
current international $
Source
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 4,546 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Tax revenue is defined as compulsory transfers to the central government for public purposes. Public expenditure on health care is defined as all the recurrent and capital spending from government, external borrowing and grants, and social health insurance funds. Both variables are measured in current international $, which adjusts for price differences between countries.