Equatorial Guinea vs Lesotho: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita

Equatorial Guinea
196.51 current international $
in 2023
Lesotho
178.69 current international $
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
133rd
Lesotho rank
135th

Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Lesotho
50100150200250200020112023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 196.51 current international $ against 178.69 current international $ in Lesotho, a difference of 17.82 current international $.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lesotho ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 133rd and Lesotho ranks 135th of 193 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Lesotho Difference Ahead
2000s 99.36 current international $ 61.09 current international $ 38.27 current international $ Equatorial Guinea
2010s 160.99 current international $ 148.33 current international $ 12.66 current international $ Equatorial Guinea
2020s 171.93 current international $ 150.04 current international $ 21.9 current international $ Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Lesotho?
Equatorial Guinea, at 196.51 current international $ against 178.69 current international $ in Lesotho as of 2023.
What is the difference in tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
17.82 current international $, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Lesotho rank globally for tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 133rd and Lesotho ranks 135th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Lesotho: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/equatorial-guinea/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/equatorial-guinea/lesotho/">Equatorial Guinea vs Lesotho: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita
Unit
current international $
Source
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 4,546 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Tax revenue is defined as compulsory transfers to the central government for public purposes. Public expenditure on health care is defined as all the recurrent and capital spending from government, external borrowing and grants, and social health insurance funds. Both variables are measured in current international $, which adjusts for price differences between countries.