Botswana vs North Macedonia: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita

Botswana
988.17 current international $
in 2023
North Macedonia
1,041 current international $
in 2023
Botswana rank
72nd
North Macedonia rank
71st

Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita over time

  • Botswana
  • North Macedonia
2004006008001.0k200020112023

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 1,041 current international $ against 988.17 current international $ in Botswana, a difference of 52.83 current international $.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Botswana's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 72nd and North Macedonia ranks 71st of 193 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 378.52 current international $ 345.16 current international $ 33.35 current international $ Botswana
2010s 598.36 current international $ 598.87 current international $ 0.5066 current international $ North Macedonia
2020s 850.27 current international $ 996.08 current international $ 145.81 current international $ North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita, Botswana or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 1,041 current international $ against 988.17 current international $ in Botswana as of 2023.
What is the difference in tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita between Botswana and North Macedonia?
52.83 current international $, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and North Macedonia?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Botswana and North Macedonia rank globally for tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita?
Botswana ranks 72nd and North Macedonia ranks 71st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs North Macedonia: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/botswana/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/botswana/north-macedonia/">Botswana vs North Macedonia: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita
Unit
current international $
Source
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 4,546 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Tax revenue is defined as compulsory transfers to the central government for public purposes. Public expenditure on health care is defined as all the recurrent and capital spending from government, external borrowing and grants, and social health insurance funds. Both variables are measured in current international $, which adjusts for price differences between countries.