Bangladesh vs Uganda: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita

Bangladesh
28.75 current international $
in 2023
Uganda
30.25 current international $
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
173rd
Uganda rank
172nd

Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Uganda
102030200020112023

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 30.25 current international $ against 28.75 current international $ in Bangladesh, a difference of 1.5 current international $.

That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 173rd and Uganda ranks 172nd of 193 countries.

Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Uganda Difference Ahead
2000s 9.32 current international $ 15.08 current international $ 5.75 current international $ Uganda
2010s 18.83 current international $ 19.11 current international $ 0.28 current international $ Uganda
2020s 27.54 current international $ 30.85 current international $ 3.31 current international $ Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita, Bangladesh or Uganda?
Uganda, at 30.25 current international $ against 28.75 current international $ in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita between Bangladesh and Uganda?
1.5 current international $, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Uganda?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and Uganda rank globally for tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita?
Bangladesh ranks 173rd and Uganda ranks 172nd of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Uganda: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/bangladesh/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/bangladesh/uganda/">Bangladesh vs Uganda: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita
Unit
current international $
Source
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 4,546 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Tax revenue is defined as compulsory transfers to the central government for public purposes. Public expenditure on health care is defined as all the recurrent and capital spending from government, external borrowing and grants, and social health insurance funds. Both variables are measured in current international $, which adjusts for price differences between countries.