Australia vs Belgium: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita

Australia
5,665 current international $
in 2023
Belgium
5,516 current international $
in 2023
Australia rank
11th
Belgium rank
13th

Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Belgium
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k200020112023

How they compare

Australia currently reports 5,665 current international $ against 5,516 current international $ in Belgium, a difference of 149 current international $.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.

Australia ranks 11th and Belgium ranks 13th of 193 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belgium Difference Ahead
2000s 2,012 current international $ 2,260 current international $ 247.63 current international $ Belgium
2010s 3,257 current international $ 3,794 current international $ 536.46 current international $ Belgium
2020s 5,128 current international $ 5,256 current international $ 127.74 current international $ Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita, Australia or Belgium?
Australia, at 5,665 current international $ against 5,516 current international $ in Belgium as of 2023.
What is the difference in tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita between Australia and Belgium?
149 current international $, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belgium?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Australia and Belgium rank globally for tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita?
Australia ranks 11th and Belgium ranks 13th of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belgium: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/australia/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/tax-revenue-per-capita-and-public-health-spending-per-capita-in-developing-countries-in/australia/belgium/">Australia vs Belgium: Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Tax revenue per capita and public health spending per capita
Unit
current international $
Source
Global Health Expenditure Database, WHO, via World Bank (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
193 places, 4,546 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed

Tax revenue is defined as compulsory transfers to the central government for public purposes. Public expenditure on health care is defined as all the recurrent and capital spending from government, external borrowing and grants, and social health insurance funds. Both variables are measured in current international $, which adjusts for price differences between countries.