Nauru vs Zimbabwe: Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort)
Nauru
48.6%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
50.8%
in 2024
Nauru rank
213th
Zimbabwe rank
212th
Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort) over time
- Nauru
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 50.8% against 48.6% in Nauru, a difference of 2.2%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 213th and Zimbabwe ranks 212th of 218 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 46.0% | 45.3% | 0.7% | Nauru |
| 1970s | 44.9% | 45.6% | 0.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 43.2% | 48.9% | 5.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 45.5% | 31.8% | 13.7% | Nauru |
| 2000s | 42.7% | 23.5% | 19.1% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 44.3% | 43.0% | 1.3% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 47.5% | 48.5% | 1.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher survival to age 65, male, Nauru or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 50.8% against 48.6% in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in survival to age 65, male between Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 2.2%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Zimbabwe rank globally for survival to age 65, male?
- Nauru ranks 213th and Zimbabwe ranks 212th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division, published as Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Survival to age 65 refers to the percentage of a cohort of newborn infants that would survive to age 65, if subject to age specific mortality rates of the specified year.