IBRD only vs Malta: Survival to age 65, male
IBRD only
75.2%
in 2024
Malta
90.2%
in 2024
IBRD only rank
18th
Malta rank
18th
Survival to age 65, male over time
- IBRD only
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 90.2% against 75.2% in IBRD only, a difference of 15.0%.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times IBRD only's.
Across all 65 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
IBRD only ranks 18th and Malta ranks 18th of 47 groups.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IBRD only | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 42.3% | 68.7% | 26.4% | Malta |
| 1970s | 50.9% | 71.9% | 21.0% | Malta |
| 1980s | 57.9% | 76.7% | 18.8% | Malta |
| 1990s | 63.0% | 83.1% | 20.1% | Malta |
| 2000s | 67.6% | 86.8% | 19.2% | Malta |
| 2010s | 72.4% | 88.4% | 16.0% | Malta |
| 2020s | 73.4% | 89.4% | 16.0% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher survival to age 65, male, IBRD only or Malta?
- Malta, at 90.2% against 75.2% in IBRD only as of 2024.
- What is the difference in survival to age 65, male between IBRD only and Malta?
- 15.0%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IBRD only and Malta?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
- How do IBRD only and Malta rank globally for survival to age 65, male?
- IBRD only ranks 18th and Malta ranks 18th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division, published as Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Survival to age 65 refers to the percentage of a cohort of newborn infants that would survive to age 65, if subject to age specific mortality rates of the specified year.