Curacao vs Malaysia: Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort)
Curacao
78.0%
in 2024
Malaysia
78.0%
in 2024
Curacao rank
91st
Malaysia rank
89th
Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort) over time
- Curacao
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 78.0% against 78.0% in Curacao, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Curacao ahead.
Curacao ranks 91st and Malaysia ranks 89th of 218 countries.
Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 63.1% | 52.2% | 10.9% | Curacao |
| 1970s | 67.3% | 59.8% | 7.5% | Curacao |
| 1980s | 71.0% | 65.8% | 5.2% | Curacao |
| 1990s | 72.7% | 69.7% | 3.0% | Curacao |
| 2000s | 74.0% | 73.6% | 0.3% | Curacao |
| 2010s | 77.1% | 75.8% | 1.4% | Curacao |
| 2020s | 77.2% | 75.9% | 1.3% | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher survival to age 65, male, Curacao or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 78.0% against 78.0% in Curacao as of 2024.
- What is the difference in survival to age 65, male between Curacao and Malaysia?
- 0.0%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Malaysia?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
- How do Curacao and Malaysia rank globally for survival to age 65, male?
- Curacao ranks 91st and Malaysia ranks 89th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division, published as Survival to age 65, male (% of cohort). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Survival to age 65 refers to the percentage of a cohort of newborn infants that would survive to age 65, if subject to age specific mortality rates of the specified year.