Nauru vs Zimbabwe: Survival to age 65, female (% of cohort)
Nauru
59.5%
in 2024
Zimbabwe
61.2%
in 2024
Nauru rank
214th
Zimbabwe rank
211th
Survival to age 65, female (% of cohort) over time
- Nauru
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 61.2% against 59.5% in Nauru, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Nauru ahead.
Nauru ranks 214th and Zimbabwe ranks 211th of 218 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Nauru averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 57.8% | 56.1% | 1.7% | Nauru |
| 1970s | 60.6% | 60.6% | 0.0% | Nauru |
| 1980s | 60.3% | 63.4% | 3.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 60.8% | 41.3% | 19.4% | Nauru |
| 2000s | 58.7% | 25.7% | 32.9% | Nauru |
| 2010s | 60.1% | 49.1% | 10.9% | Nauru |
| 2020s | 58.7% | 58.8% | 0.0% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher survival to age 65, female, Nauru or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 61.2% against 59.5% in Nauru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in survival to age 65, female between Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 1.7%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Zimbabwe?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
- How do Nauru and Zimbabwe rank globally for survival to age 65, female?
- Nauru ranks 214th and Zimbabwe ranks 211th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division, published as Survival to age 65, female (% of cohort). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Survival to age 65 refers to the percentage of a cohort of newborn infants that would survive to age 65, if subject to age specific mortality rates of the specified year.