Chile vs Curacao: Survival to age 65, female (% of cohort)
Chile
90.8%
in 2024
Curacao
90.8%
in 2024
Chile rank
58th
Curacao rank
57th
Survival to age 65, female (% of cohort) over time
- Chile
- Curacao
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 90.8% against 90.8% in Chile, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Curacao ahead.
Chile ranks 58th and Curacao ranks 57th of 218 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Curacao in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Curacao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 62.8% | 72.4% | 9.6% | Curacao |
| 1970s | 73.2% | 77.6% | 4.3% | Curacao |
| 1980s | 82.3% | 81.5% | 0.8% | Chile |
| 1990s | 86.3% | 83.7% | 2.6% | Chile |
| 2000s | 88.6% | 85.8% | 2.9% | Chile |
| 2010s | 89.8% | 89.6% | 0.2% | Chile |
| 2020s | 89.9% | 90.3% | 0.4% | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher survival to age 65, female, Chile or Curacao?
- Curacao, at 90.8% against 90.8% in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in survival to age 65, female between Chile and Curacao?
- 0.0%, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Curacao?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Curacao rank globally for survival to age 65, female?
- Chile ranks 58th and Curacao ranks 57th of 218 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Population Prospects, United Nations (UN), publisher: UN Population Division, published as Survival to age 65, female (% of cohort). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Survival to age 65 refers to the percentage of a cohort of newborn infants that would survive to age 65, if subject to age specific mortality rates of the specified year.