Niger vs Seychelles: Social Security expenditure on health
Social Security expenditure on health over time
- Niger
- Seychelles
How they compare
Niger currently reports 1.3% against 1.1% in Seychelles, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Seychelles ahead.
Niger ranks 23rd and Seychelles ranks 24th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Niger averaged higher in 1 and Seychelles in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Niger | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.0% | 4.7% | 1.7% | Seychelles |
| 2000s | 1.9% | 3.3% | 1.4% | Seychelles |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 1.1% | 0.2% | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher social security expenditure on health, Niger or Seychelles?
- Niger, at 1.3% against 1.1% in Seychelles as of 2011.
- What is the difference in social security expenditure on health between Niger and Seychelles?
- 0.2%, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Seychelles?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Niger and Seychelles rank globally for social security expenditure on health?
- Niger ranks 23rd and Seychelles ranks 24th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization (http://www.who.int/nha/country/en/), published as Social Security expenditure on health (% government expenditure on health). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Social security funds comprise the expenditure on health by social security institutions. Social security or national health insurance schemes are imposed and controlled by government units for the purpose of providing social benefits to members of the community as a whole or to particular segments of the community. They include direct outlays to medical care providers and to suppliers of medical goods as well as reimbursements to households and the supply of services in kind to the enrollees.