SEAR vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate
SEAR
89.0%
in 2011
Saint Kitts and Nevis
100.0%
in 2011
SEAR rank
3rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate over time
- SEAR
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 100.0% against 89.0% in SEAR, a difference of 11.0%.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times SEAR's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 10 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
SEAR ranks 3rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 16 groups.
Across the 3 decades both report, SEAR averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | SEAR | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 35.7% | 45.0% | 9.3% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2000s | 84.0% | 57.0% | 27.0% | SEAR |
| 2010s | 88.5% | 100.0% | 11.5% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate, SEAR or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 100.0% against 89.0% in SEAR as of 2011.
- What is the difference in smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate between SEAR and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 11.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for SEAR and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do SEAR and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate?
- SEAR ranks 3rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 16 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.