Mus vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%)
Mus
90.0%
in 2011
Saint Kitts and Nevis
100.0%
in 2011
Mus rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%) over time
- Mus
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 100.0% against 90.0% in Mus, a difference of 10.0%.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.1 times Mus's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Mus ahead.
Mus ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 2 regions.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mus averaged higher in 2 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mus | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 89.0% | 37.5% | 51.5% | Mus |
| 2000s | 88.8% | 57.0% | 31.8% | Mus |
| 2010s | 90.0% | 100.0% | 10.0% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate, Mus or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 100.0% against 90.0% in Mus as of 2011.
- What is the difference in smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate between Mus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 10.0%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mus and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2011.
- How do Mus and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate?
- Mus ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 2 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.