Low income (World Bank) vs Oman: Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate
Low income (World Bank)
87.0%
in 2011
Oman
97.0%
in 2011
Low income (World Bank) rank
5th
Oman rank
7th
Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate over time
- Low income (World Bank)
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 97.0% against 87.0% in Low income (World Bank), a difference of 10.0%.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Low income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 17 years both countries report, Oman has been ahead every year.
Low income (World Bank) ranks 5th and Oman ranks 7th of 10 groups.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income (World Bank) | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 69.0% | 88.6% | 19.6% | Oman |
| 2000s | 81.9% | 91.8% | 9.9% | Oman |
| 2010s | 87.0% | 97.0% | 10.0% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate, Low income (World Bank) or Oman?
- Oman, at 97.0% against 87.0% in Low income (World Bank) as of 2011.
- What is the difference in smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate between Low income (World Bank) and Oman?
- 10.0%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income (World Bank) and Oman?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Low income (World Bank) and Oman rank globally for smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate?
- Low income (World Bank) ranks 5th and Oman ranks 7th of 10 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.