High income (World Bank) vs Kiribati: Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate
High income (World Bank)
63.0%
in 2011
Kiribati
94.0%
in 2011
High income (World Bank) rank
10th
Kiribati rank
12th
Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate over time
- High income (World Bank)
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 94.0% against 63.0% in High income (World Bank), a difference of 31.0%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times High income (World Bank)'s.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
High income (World Bank) ranks 10th and Kiribati ranks 12th of 10 groups.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income (World Bank) | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 71.0% | 86.0% | 15.0% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 67.2% | 92.2% | 25.0% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 62.5% | 93.5% | 31.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate, High income (World Bank) or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 94.0% against 63.0% in High income (World Bank) as of 2011.
- What is the difference in smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate between High income (World Bank) and Kiribati?
- 31.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income (World Bank) and Kiribati?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do High income (World Bank) and Kiribati rank globally for smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate?
- High income (World Bank) ranks 10th and Kiribati ranks 12th of 10 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.