AMR vs Kiribati: Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate
AMR
78.0%
in 2011
Kiribati
94.0%
in 2011
AMR rank
12th
Kiribati rank
12th
Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate over time
- AMR
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 94.0% against 78.0% in AMR, a difference of 16.0%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.2 times AMR's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
AMR ranks 12th and Kiribati ranks 12th of 16 groups.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AMR | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 65.3% | 86.0% | 20.7% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 77.2% | 92.2% | 15.0% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 76.5% | 93.5% | 17.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate, AMR or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 94.0% against 78.0% in AMR as of 2011.
- What is the difference in smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate between AMR and Kiribati?
- 16.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AMR and Kiribati?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do AMR and Kiribati rank globally for smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate?
- AMR ranks 12th and Kiribati ranks 12th of 16 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.