AFR vs Kiribati: Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate
AFR
82.0%
in 2011
Kiribati
94.0%
in 2011
AFR rank
10th
Kiribati rank
12th
Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate over time
- AFR
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 94.0% against 82.0% in AFR, a difference of 12.0%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times AFR's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Kiribati has been ahead every year.
AFR ranks 10th and Kiribati ranks 12th of 16 groups.
Kiribati has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | AFR | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 66.0% | 86.0% | 20.0% | Kiribati |
| 2000s | 75.2% | 92.2% | 17.0% | Kiribati |
| 2010s | 81.5% | 93.5% | 12.0% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate, AFR or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 94.0% against 82.0% in AFR as of 2011.
- What is the difference in smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate between AFR and Kiribati?
- 12.0%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for AFR and Kiribati?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do AFR and Kiribati rank globally for smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate?
- AFR ranks 10th and Kiribati ranks 12th of 16 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Smear-positive tuberculosis treatment-success rate (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.