Hong Kong vs Zimbabwe: Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese
Hong Kong
6.1
in 2014
Zimbabwe
5.6
in 2014
Hong Kong rank
65th
Zimbabwe rank
68th
Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese over time
- Hong Kong
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 6.1 against 5.6 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.5.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 198 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 9.06 | 10.1 | 1.04 | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 8.04 | 8.66 | 0.62 | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 7.25 | 7.21 | 0.04 | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 6.79 | 6.25 | 0.54 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 6.22 | 5.8 | 0.42 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese, Hong Kong or Zimbabwe?
- Hong Kong, at 6.1 against 5.6 in Zimbabwe as of 2014.
- What is the difference in share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese between Hong Kong and Zimbabwe?
- 0.5, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Zimbabwe?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2014.
- How do Hong Kong and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese?
- Hong Kong ranks 65th and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.