Eswatini vs Zimbabwe: Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese
Eswatini
4.8
in 2014
Zimbabwe
5.6
in 2014
Eswatini rank
71st
Zimbabwe rank
68th
Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese over time
- Eswatini
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 5.6 against 4.8 in Eswatini, a difference of 0.8.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 198 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 11.66 | 10.1 | 1.56 | Eswatini |
| 1980s | 9.94 | 8.66 | 1.28 | Eswatini |
| 1990s | 7.96 | 7.21 | 0.75 | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 6.22 | 6.25 | 0.03 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 5.06 | 5.8 | 0.74 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese, Eswatini or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 5.6 against 4.8 in Eswatini as of 2014.
- What is the difference in share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese between Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zimbabwe?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2014.
- How do Eswatini and Zimbabwe rank globally for share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese?
- Eswatini ranks 71st and Zimbabwe ranks 68th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.