Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Share of women defined as underweight, healthy, overweight or obese

Equatorial Guinea
8.4%
in 2014
Namibia
8.7%
in 2014
Equatorial Guinea rank
53rd
Namibia rank
51st

Share of women defined as underweight, healthy, overweight or obese over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Namibia
051015197519942014

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 8.7% against 8.4% in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.3%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 51st of 198 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1970s 15.8% 15.3% 0.5% Equatorial Guinea
1980s 14.9% 14.0% 0.9% Equatorial Guinea
1990s 13.5% 12.4% 1.1% Equatorial Guinea
2000s 10.6% 10.5% 0.0% Equatorial Guinea
2010s 8.7% 9.0% 0.3% Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher share of women defined as underweight, healthy, overweight or obese, Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
Namibia, at 8.7% against 8.4% in Equatorial Guinea as of 2014.
What is the difference in share of women defined as underweight, healthy, overweight or obese between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
0.3%, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
40 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2014.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for share of women defined as underweight, healthy, overweight or obese?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 53rd and Namibia ranks 51st of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Share of women defined as underweight, healthy, overweight or obese. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Share of women defined as underweight, healthy, overweight or obese. Statizoid, drawing on NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2017) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-women-defined-as-underweight-healthy-overweight-or-obese/equatorial-guinea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/share-of-women-defined-as-underweight-healthy-overweight-or-obese/equatorial-guinea/namibia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Share of women defined as underweight, healthy, overweight or obese</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Share of women defined as underweight, healthy, overweight or obese
Unit
%
Source
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (2017) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
198 places, 7,920 data points, 1975–2014
Last refreshed

Share of women (% of adult population), who are underweight, healthy/normal, overweight or obese based on body mass index (BMI). Body Mass Index (BMI) is a person's weight divided by their height squared. The WHO define a BMI <=18.5 as underweight; 18.6 to 25.0 as normal/healthy; 25.1 to 30 as overweight; and >30.0 as obese.