Cook Islands vs Tokelau: Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese
Cook Islands
0.7
in 2014
Tokelau
0.7
in 2014
Cook Islands rank
192nd
Tokelau rank
192nd
Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese over time
- Cook Islands
- Tokelau
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 0.7 against 0.7 in Tokelau, a difference of 0.
Across all 40 years both countries report, Tokelau has been ahead every year.
Cook Islands ranks 192nd and Tokelau ranks 192nd of 198 countries.
Tokelau has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Tokelau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.48 | 3.9 | 1.42 | Tokelau |
| 1980s | 1.8 | 2.68 | 0.88 | Tokelau |
| 1990s | 1.19 | 1.65 | 0.46 | Tokelau |
| 2000s | 0.85 | 1.05 | 0.2 | Tokelau |
| 2010s | 0.7 | 0.74 | 0.04 | Tokelau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese, Cook Islands or Tokelau?
- Cook Islands, at 0.7 against 0.7 in Tokelau as of 2014.
- What is the difference in share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese between Cook Islands and Tokelau?
- 0, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Tokelau?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2014.
- How do Cook Islands and Tokelau rank globally for share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese?
- Cook Islands ranks 192nd and Tokelau ranks 192nd of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.