Cook Islands vs Nauru: Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese
Cook Islands
0.7
in 2014
Nauru
0.6
in 2014
Cook Islands rank
192nd
Nauru rank
195th
Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese over time
- Cook Islands
- Nauru
How they compare
Cook Islands currently reports 0.7 against 0.6 in Nauru, a difference of 0.1.
That makes Cook Islands's figure about 1.2 times Nauru's.
Across all 40 years both countries report, Cook Islands has been ahead every year.
Cook Islands ranks 192nd and Nauru ranks 195th of 198 countries.
Cook Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cook Islands | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 2.48 | 0.68 | 1.8 | Cook Islands |
| 1980s | 1.8 | 0.57 | 1.23 | Cook Islands |
| 1990s | 1.19 | 0.5 | 0.69 | Cook Islands |
| 2000s | 0.85 | 0.58 | 0.27 | Cook Islands |
| 2010s | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.1 | Cook Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese, Cook Islands or Nauru?
- Cook Islands, at 0.7 against 0.6 in Nauru as of 2014.
- What is the difference in share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese between Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 0.1, with Cook Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cook Islands and Nauru?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2014.
- How do Cook Islands and Nauru rank globally for share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese?
- Cook Islands ranks 192nd and Nauru ranks 195th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Share of women defined as underweight healthy overweight or obese. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.