Myanmar vs Trinidad and Tobago: Share of population that cannot afford a healthy diet
Myanmar
38.0%
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
36.8%
in 2024
Myanmar rank
61st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
63rd
Share of population that cannot afford a healthy diet over time
- Myanmar
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 38.0% against 36.8% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.2%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Myanmar ranks 61st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 63rd of 150 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 42.9% | 32.3% | 10.6% | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 45.9% | 37.9% | 8.1% | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher share of population that cannot afford a healthy diet, Myanmar or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Myanmar, at 38.0% against 36.8% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
- What is the difference in share of population that cannot afford a healthy diet between Myanmar and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.2%, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Myanmar and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for share of population that cannot afford a healthy diet?
- Myanmar ranks 61st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 63rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO and World Bank (2025), using data and methods from Bai et al. (2024) – with minor processing by Our World in Data, published as Share of population that cannot afford a healthy diet. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Percentage of the total population unable to afford a healthy diet. A diet is considered unaffordable when the diet cost plus expenditures for basic non-food needs exceed income per capita per day.