New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Rubella - number of reported cases
New Zealand
0
in 2025
Timor-Leste
0
in 2025
New Zealand rank
91st
Timor-Leste rank
91st
Rubella - number of reported cases over time
- New Zealand
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0 against 0 in Timor-Leste, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 91st and Timor-Leste ranks 91st of 207 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.33 | 0.6667 | 7.67 | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 4.11 | 6 | 1.89 | Timor-Leste |
| 2020s | 0 | 13 | 13 | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rubella - number of reported cases, New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
- New Zealand, at 0 against 0 in Timor-Leste as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rubella - number of reported cases between New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
- 0, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2025.
- How do New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for rubella - number of reported cases?
- New Zealand ranks 91st and Timor-Leste ranks 91st of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory, published as Rubella - number of reported cases. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.