Sudan vs Uganda: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Sudan
63.3%
in 2022
Uganda
68.4%
in 2022
Sudan rank
18th
Uganda rank
15th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Sudan
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 68.4% against 63.3% in Sudan, a difference of 5.1%.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 16 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 18th and Uganda ranks 15th of 134 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 54.0% | 87.4% | 33.5% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 66.5% | 73.7% | 7.2% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 61.5% | 69.1% | 7.7% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Sudan or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 68.4% against 63.3% in Sudan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Sudan and Uganda?
- 5.1%, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Uganda?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Sudan and Uganda rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Sudan ranks 18th and Uganda ranks 15th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.