Pakistan vs Papua New Guinea: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care

Pakistan
33.7%
in 2022
Papua New Guinea
39.5%
in 2022
Pakistan rank
36th
Papua New Guinea rank
34th

Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time

  • Pakistan
  • Papua New Guinea
20406080200320122022

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 39.5% against 33.7% in Pakistan, a difference of 5.8%.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Pakistan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 36th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 134 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2000s 70.0% 35.2% 34.8% Pakistan
2010s 56.7% 39.9% 16.8% Pakistan
2020s 36.6% 39.9% 3.3% Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Pakistan or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 39.5% against 33.7% in Pakistan as of 2022.
What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Pakistan and Papua New Guinea?
5.8%, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Papua New Guinea?
14 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
How do Pakistan and Papua New Guinea rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
Pakistan ranks 36th and Papua New Guinea ranks 34th of 134 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Papua New Guinea: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care. Statizoid, drawing on Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-for-surgical-care-percent-of-people-at-risk/pakistan/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/risk-of-catastrophic-expenditure-for-surgical-care-percent-of-people-at-risk/pakistan/papua-new-guinea/">Pakistan vs Papua New Guinea: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk)
Unit
% of people at risk
Source
Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
173 places, 3,065 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.