Mauritius vs Mongolia: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Mauritius
8.8%
in 2022
Mongolia
10.4%
in 2022
Mauritius rank
76th
Mongolia rank
73rd
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Mauritius
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 10.4% against 8.8% in Mauritius, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 76th and Mongolia ranks 73rd of 134 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 18.2% | 21.5% | 3.3% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 11.8% | 15.8% | 4.0% | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 8.7% | 9.2% | 0.5% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Mauritius or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 10.4% against 8.8% in Mauritius as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Mauritius and Mongolia?
- 1.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Mongolia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2022.
- How do Mauritius and Mongolia rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Mauritius ranks 76th and Mongolia ranks 73rd of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.