Mali vs Tanzania: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Mali
46.6%
in 2022
Tanzania
45.9%
in 2019
Mali rank
29th
Tanzania rank
30th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Mali
- Tanzania
How they compare
Mali currently reports 46.6% against 45.9% in Tanzania, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 29th and Tanzania ranks 30th of 134 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 88.8% | 76.1% | 12.8% | Mali |
| 2010s | 58.9% | 52.3% | 6.7% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Mali or Tanzania?
- Mali, at 46.6% against 45.9% in Tanzania as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Mali and Tanzania?
- 0.7%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Tanzania?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do Mali and Tanzania rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Mali ranks 29th and Tanzania ranks 30th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.