Jamaica vs Lebanon: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Jamaica
3.1%
in 2022
Lebanon
4.1%
in 2015
Jamaica rank
92nd
Lebanon rank
89th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Jamaica
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 4.1% against 3.1% in Jamaica, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.3 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Lebanon ahead.
Jamaica ranks 92nd and Lebanon ranks 89th of 134 countries.
Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Jamaica or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 4.1% against 3.1% in Jamaica as of 2015.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Jamaica and Lebanon?
- 1.0%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Lebanon?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2015.
- How do Jamaica and Lebanon rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Jamaica ranks 92nd and Lebanon ranks 89th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.