IDA total vs Niger: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
IDA total
52.4%
in 2018
Niger
86.3%
in 2018
IDA total rank
5th
Niger rank
8th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- IDA total
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 86.3% against 52.4% in IDA total, a difference of 33.9%.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.6 times IDA total's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.
IDA total ranks 5th and Niger ranks 8th of 39 groups.
Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA total | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.3% | 95.7% | 27.3% | Niger |
| 2010s | 56.8% | 92.2% | 35.4% | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, IDA total or Niger?
- Niger, at 86.3% against 52.4% in IDA total as of 2018.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between IDA total and Niger?
- 33.9%, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Niger?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2018.
- How do IDA total and Niger rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- IDA total ranks 5th and Niger ranks 8th of 39 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.