Honduras vs Tanzania: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Honduras
45.8%
in 2022
Tanzania
45.9%
in 2019
Honduras rank
31st
Tanzania rank
30th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Honduras
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 45.9% against 45.8% in Honduras, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Tanzania ahead.
Honduras ranks 31st and Tanzania ranks 30th of 134 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 60.5% | 76.1% | 15.6% | Tanzania |
| 2010s | 52.6% | 51.6% | 0.9% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Honduras or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 45.9% against 45.8% in Honduras as of 2019.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Honduras and Tanzania?
- 0.1%, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Tanzania?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Honduras and Tanzania rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Honduras ranks 31st and Tanzania ranks 30th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.