Guatemala vs Mali: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Guatemala
44.1%
in 2022
Mali
46.6%
in 2022
Guatemala rank
32nd
Mali rank
29th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Guatemala
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 46.6% against 44.1% in Guatemala, a difference of 2.5%.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Guatemala's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Mali ahead.
Guatemala ranks 32nd and Mali ranks 29th of 134 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 50.0% | 86.3% | 36.3% | Mali |
| 2010s | 40.8% | 50.1% | 9.3% | Mali |
| 2020s | 43.0% | 44.1% | 1.1% | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Guatemala or Mali?
- Mali, at 46.6% against 44.1% in Guatemala as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Guatemala and Mali?
- 2.5%, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Mali?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2022.
- How do Guatemala and Mali rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Guatemala ranks 32nd and Mali ranks 29th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.