Denmark vs United Kingdom: Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care
Denmark
0.0%
in 2022
United Kingdom
0.0%
in 2022
Denmark rank
124th
United Kingdom rank
124th
Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care over time
- Denmark
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2003 it was United Kingdom ahead.
Denmark ranks 124th and United Kingdom ranks 124th of 134 countries.
United Kingdom has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | United Kingdom |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | United Kingdom |
| 2020s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care, Denmark or United Kingdom?
- Denmark, at 0.0% against 0.0% in United Kingdom as of 2022.
- What is the difference in risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care between Denmark and United Kingdom?
- 0.0%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and United Kingdom?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Denmark and United Kingdom rank globally for risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care?
- Denmark ranks 124th and United Kingdom ranks 124th of 134 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Program in Global Surgery and Social Change (PGSSC), Harvard Medical School, published as Risk of catastrophic expenditure for surgical care (% of people at risk). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The proportion of population at risk of catastrophic expenditure when surgical care is required. Catastrophic expenditure is defined as direct out of pocket payments for surgical and anaesthesia care exceeding 10% of total income.